> Do you have a pointer to the concrete problems? I'm not aware of any recent > ABI changes in that area.
I have not tried it yet. My fear of having to drop LSB is based on lsbcc's unwillingness to use versions of GCC it doesn't know about, and the lack of updates to LSB 5.0. Best, -- John Dallman DI SW TO OT PC PDE Technology & Innovation Nullius in verba Siemens Industry Sector Siemens Industry Software Limited Francis House, 112 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PH, United Kingdom Tel. :+44 (1223) 371554 Fax :+44 (1223) 371700 [email protected] www.siemens.com/plm > -----Original Message----- > From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]> > Sent: 23 August 2019 11:21 > To: Dallman, John (DI SW TO OT PC PDE) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] ISO LSB standard > > * John Dallman: > > > I'm still producing C libraries with LSB 5.0, which I can manage > > because the only libraries I use are glibc and libgcc_s. However, this > > requires care to allow C++ stack unwinding to work through C call > > stacks, and I fear that when I next upgrade my build environment > > (currently CentOS 7) to one with GCC 7.x or later, I'll have to give > > up LSB for that, too. > > Do you have a pointer to the concrete problems? I'm not aware of any recent > ABI changes in that area. > > (The C++ problems I can understand because older ABIs just do not provide > support for non-historic C++ interfaces.) > > Thanks, > Florian ----------------- Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 3476850. Registered office: Faraday House, Sir William Siemens Square, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 8QD. _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
