lsb-spec  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 Stuart Anderson
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 gk4
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 4 "frederic.gache
• VSX-PCTS 4.4.4 now available Andrew Josey
• /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 3 Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 3 Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 3 Raul Miller
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 3 Daniel Quinlan
• /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 2 Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal, draft 2 H. Peter Anvin
• Two mailinglists? Hugo . van . der . Kooij
  • Re: Two mailinglists? Daniel Quinlan
• Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Alan Cox
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Alan Cox
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Alan Cox
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Sean Channel
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Jim Knoble
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 H. Peter Anvin
  • /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal Jim Knoble
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal Alan Cox
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail specification proposal H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Commands and Utilities Proposal, 0.2 Andrew Josey
• specification meeting attendee list Daniel Quinlan
• Issue with LSB 0.1: Dynamic Linking: Program Interpreter Joel Klecker
  • Re: Issue with LSB 0.1: Dynamic Linking: Program Interpreter Stuart Anderson
  • Re: Issue with LSB 0.1: Dynamic Linking: Program Interpreter Andreas Jaeger
• LSB conference calls... Daniel Quinlan
• Motif APIs gk4
  • Re: Motif APIs Alan Cox
  • Re: Motif APIs Daniel Quinlan
  • LSB specification documents Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
• blocked rooms for the specification meeting Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: blocked rooms for the specification meeting John H Terpstra
  • Re: Access to TurboLinux for LSB Test Work John H Terpstra
• LSB Specification Technical meeting update Daniel Quinlan
  • LSB Specification Technical meeting plan Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: LSB Specification Technical meeting plan John H Terpstra
• indicate interest in LSB spec meeting Daniel Quinlan
• Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Anthony Towns
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Alan Cox
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Andrew Josey
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Marek Habersack
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Andrew Josey
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Andrew Josey
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Marek Habersack
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Stuart Anderson
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Marek Habersack
  • Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command Stuart Anderson
• Meeting location in NYC? Daniel Quinlan
  • RE: Meeting location in NYC? Jodi Gower
• /etc/passwd and /etc/group Daniel Quinlan
• pending LSB action items Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: pending LSB action items Julie
  • Re: pending LSB action items Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: pending LSB action items tytso
  • Re: pending LSB action items Daniel Quinlan
• Specification meeting Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: Specification meeting John H Terpstra
  • Re: Specification meeting Alan Cox
  • Re: Specification meeting Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: Specification meeting Alan Cox
  • Re: Specification meeting Jim Knoble
  • Re: Specification meeting V-man
  • Re: Specification meeting Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
  • Re: Specification meeting Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: Specification meeting Ralf Flaxa
  • Re: Specification meeting H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Specification meeting V-man
• Re: Source packages? James Dingwall
• FHS 2.1 release imminent Daniel Quinlan
• ELF Information Stuart Anderson
  • Re: ELF Information Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
  • Re: ELF Information Stuart Anderson
• .rpm? .lsb?? Raul Miller
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Raul Miller
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Jim Knoble
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Raul Miller
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Raul Miller
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Jim Knoble
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Raul Miller
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? Alan Cox
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: .rpm? .lsb?? valentin
• Gifts & Collectibles!! New products online shopping!! 5a9uj
• shared font directory and font installation Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: shared font directory and font installation Alan Cox
  • Re: shared font directory and font installation Jim Knoble
  • Re: shared font directory and font installation Rodney W. Grimes
  • Re: shared font directory and font installation Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: shared font directory and font installation Alan Cox
• Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming James Dingwall
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming Hugo van der Kooij
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming V man
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming James Dingwall
  • Source packages? Stuart Anderson
  • Re: Source packages? Erik Troan
  • Re: Source packages? Julie
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming Donnie Barnes
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming Donnie Barnes
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming James Dingwall
  • Re: Comments: Draft spec and package format/naming Erik Troan
• architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) Alan Cox
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) V man
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) Erik Troan
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) Alan Cox
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) Stuart Anderson
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) Alan Cox
  • Re: architecture names (i386-linux, etc.) H. Peter Anvin
• FYI...LSB BOF @ LinuxWorld Expo next week harnett
• PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Fabrizio Polacco
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Alan Cox
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Fabrizio Polacco
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Alan Cox
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Fabrizio Polacco
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Erik Troan
  • Re: PROPOSAL: API for device locking library. Fabrizio Polacco
• incorporating drafts into main body Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: incorporating drafts into main body tytso
  • Re: incorporating drafts into main body Tim Riker
  • Re: incorporating drafts into main body Tim Riker
• spec license Daniel Quinlan
• LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Andrew Josey
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Alan Cox
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal keld
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Julie Haugh
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Stuart Anderson
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Kai Henningsen
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Julie Haugh
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Stuart Anderson
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Jim Knoble
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Julie Haugh
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Daniel Bradley
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal keld
  • Re: LSB Commands and Utilities, Draft proposal Stuart Anderson
• force-reload and status Seva
  • Re: force-reload and status Kai Henningsen
• PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Markus Rex
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Dr. Werner Fink
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Shane Owenby
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Jim Knoble
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Dr. Werner Fink
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Jim Knoble
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Dr. Werner Fink
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Kai Henningsen
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) V man
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Daniel Quinlan
• specification of LSB commands Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: specification of LSB commands Ben Finney
  • Re: specification of LSB commands Daniel Quinlan
• init file question V man
• init file questions Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: init file questions Joel Klecker
  • Re: init file questions Jim Knoble
  • Re: init file questions Markus Rex
  • Re: init file questions Shane Owenby
• PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 4) Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 4) Jim Knoble
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 4) Alan Cox
  • Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 4) H. Peter Anvin
• [forwarded] FHS pre-2.1 draft #2 on web site Daniel Quinlan
• Unidentified subject! V man
  • Unidentified subject! V man
  • Unidentified subject! V man
  • Unidentified subject! V-man
  • Unidentified subject! nrJW3GSS7
  • Unidentified subject! ksb454av56
  • Unidentified subject! dhg6
  • Unidentified subject! fhsdhf
  • Unidentified subject! Diego Flores
• Re: LSB specification for adding users and groups V man
  • Re: LSB specification for adding users and groups Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: LSB specification for adding users and groups djb
  • Re: LSB specification for adding users and groups Daniel Quinlan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages