I made that point during the meeting - I see no reason at this point for 2 drafts here.
Andrew From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Toni Przygienda <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 5:46 PM To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Peter, Ok - we'll decide during whether to merge during the WG adoption call. It would be a good LSR experiment for a combined draft if there are no significant differences between the protocols that would make a combined draft unwieldy. agreed ... If the only difference is encoding really it may be far more practical to have one draft with appendix/section per protocol giving those, in a sense I wish we had a single bier-lsr draft albeit IME Peter/Les are doing an excellent job keeping things in tight lock-step ... thanks --- tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
