> On Aug 24, 2018, at 12:29 PM, tony...@tony.li wrote: > > Being distributed would be very nice. However, that implies that all nodes > are going to get to the exact same solution. Which implies that they all must > execute the same algorithm, presumably with the same inputs. > > That’s all well and good, but we don’t have an algorithm to really put on the > table yet. We need experience with one. We know we want to tweak things > based on biconnectivity, performance, and degree because doing it right day > one seems unlikely. Changing algorithms is going to be VERY painful if it’s > distributed. > > However, if it’s centralized, it’s completely trivial.
I find this reasoning quite compelling. Thanks, Chris.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
