Got it, thx
-----Original Message----- From: Tony Li <tony1ath...@gmail.com> On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 3:59 PM To: David Allan I <david.i.al...@ericsson.com> Cc: Peter Psenak <ppse...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding Hi Dave, > My understanding of this whole endeavor is that: > > - excessive flooding slows convergence > - so we are seeking to define a reduced flooding topology > - a failure that does not impact an FT adjacency is propagated throughout the > topology and the effects of excessive flooding have been eliminated.... great. > - a failure that does impact the flooding topology results in the topology > trying to mend itself and slowing down convergence while at > it.....potentially by a significant amount > - And the current discussion is headed in the direction of what is the right > heuristic to deal with this... > > Do I have this right? Close. More specifically, if there is a multiple failure that partitions the FT, how do we repair it? Fast or safe? Choose one. Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
