Hi, What does 'rate limit' mean in this context?
Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 2:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding > > On 07/03/2019 18:16 , [email protected] wrote: > > > > > >> On Mar 5, 2019, at 1:31 PM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Let me propose that we add something to sections 6.7.5, 6.7.9, and > >> 6.7.11 like: > >> > >> Addition of temporary flooding should be done with caution, as the > >> addition of excessive connectivity to the flooding topology may > >> trigger unwanted behavior. Routers SHOULD add temporary flooding in a > >> rate limited manner, if not configured otherwise. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I haven’t heard any feedback on this. Can we please adopt this? > > > > The draft cutoff is Monday, March 11. Could we please incorporate > > this change and the addition of the pseudonode identifier by then? > > I don't think there is an agreement on the LAN side. > > Rate limiting we can add, but we can do that after March 11, I don't see a > need > to do it before. > > thanks, > Peter > > > > > > Tony > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lsr&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0 > UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH- > s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=8bZHYmmMERie3AZxsYrvUH_fhv9JyTIkivlY1wizKms > &s=ZRx3I9aH56q-UmcY_tUkOuIAxjGDEMgE_qeMPmekSgk&e= _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
