Hi guys, I think that there’s some confusion here.
> 1) The alternate backup path would appear to also require the criteria > of being link diverse with the FT if the goal is to protect against multiple > failures. > > [HC]: Can you give some more details about this? I think that when we originally started talking about backup paths, they were intended as a protection mechanism. However, I think we’ve moved on from that and are now considering backup paths as a restoration mechanism. Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
