Authors, Now that this is a WG document, can we fix the draft title? Thanks, Acee
From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> Date: Friday, May 31, 2019 at 6:18 PM To: Paul Mattes <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-00 Hi Paul, It has been pointed out about month ago :) Ref: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/hbmJqgpnfjcsxiD40AGaTMA2tic Best, R. On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:41 PM Paul Mattes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think there is a small issue with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srvr-extensions-00. The title is: IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane I suspect that IS-IS works just fine for routing IPv6. The title should probably be: IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over IPv6 Dataplane pdm _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
