Sound good.
Thanks Peter
On 6/3/19, 3:03 AM, "Peter Psenak" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Acee,
I will fix it in the next revision.
thanks,
Peter
On 01/06/2019 01:44, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Authors,
>
> Now that this is a WG document, can we fix the draft title?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
> *From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Robert Raszuk
> <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Friday, May 31, 2019 at 6:18 PM
> *To: *Paul Mattes <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-00
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> It has been pointed out about month ago :)
>
> Ref:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/hbmJqgpnfjcsxiD40AGaTMA2tic
>
> Best,
>
> R.
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:41 PM Paul Mattes
> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> I think there is a small issue with
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srvr-extensions-00. The title is:
>
> IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane
>
> I suspect that IS-IS works just fine for routing IPv6. The title
> should probably be:
>
> IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over IPv6 Dataplane
>
> /pdm/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
