Hi Acee,
I will fix it in the next revision.
thanks,
Peter
On 01/06/2019 01:44, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors,
Now that this is a WG document, can we fix the draft title?
Thanks,
Acee
*From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Robert Raszuk
<[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, May 31, 2019 at 6:18 PM
*To: *Paul Mattes <[email protected]>
*Cc: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-00
Hi Paul,
It has been pointed out about month ago :)
Ref:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/hbmJqgpnfjcsxiD40AGaTMA2tic
Best,
R.
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:41 PM Paul Mattes
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think there is a small issue with
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srvr-extensions-00. The title is:
IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane
I suspect that IS-IS works just fine for routing IPv6. The title
should probably be:
IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over IPv6 Dataplane
/pdm/
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
