Speaking as a WG member (and someone who has followed this discussion for some time):
I support publication of this document. I have a couple minor comments: 1. Please use the US English form of “Signaling” consistently. Right now there is a mix of “Signalling” and “Signaling”. 2. Why does this referred to stacked LSPs? I think it could be applicable to a single LSP. 3. In the “Security Considerations”, please say the considerations of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 are also applicable. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com> Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:42 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org> Cc: "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, "lsr-...@ietf.org" <lsr-...@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08 We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue. This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
