>Because the intra-area link topology is not exposed across areas or to other >protocols.
Agreed Acee. But just looking this again then: 1. Not really clear why ELC is required in Section 4, when it’s confirmed from Stephane’s email (Sept 4th 2019) ERLD covers both reading + doing and action. 2. Section 4 extending RFC 7794, with E bit, which is defined for prefix attributes for inter-area purposes (no ERLD value obviously). Same thing can be achieved simply if router capability with ERLD value itself is propagated (per RFC 7981). Overall, I am more confused here than earlier. But feel free to ignore my comments. -- Uma C.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
