Hi Uma,
From: Uma Chunduri <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 2:43 PM
To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability
and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08
Support.
One question to authors:
On E bit in section 4: The motivation seems to extend this in Prefix
attributes is for inter-area consideration and advertised per every local host
prefix (link) .
Is there any specific reason why link
MSD is not considered instead ? ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8491)
Because the intra-area link topology is not exposed across areas or to other
protocols.
Thanks,
Acee
--
Uma C.
From: mpls <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability
and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08
We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe
they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy
Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the
RFC editor’s queue.
This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your
support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
