Hi Uma, From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chund...@futurewei.com> Date: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 2:43 PM To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org> Cc: "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, "lsr-...@ietf.org" <lsr-...@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org> Subject: RE: Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08
Support. One question to authors: On E bit in section 4: The motivation seems to extend this in Prefix attributes is for inter-area consideration and advertised per every local host prefix (link) . Is there any specific reason why link MSD is not considered instead ? ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8491) Because the intra-area link topology is not exposed across areas or to other protocols. Thanks, Acee -- Uma C. From: mpls <mpls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 12:42 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: m...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08 We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue. This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr