> On Mar 31, 2020, at 9:28 PM, Tianran Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> ZTR> Let's not boil the ocean to compare NETCONF/YANG or routing protocol, 
> which is better. But I did not see the modification to routing protocol with 
> some TLVs is a heavy work, or more complex than NETCONF/YANG.  I see both are 
> available and useful.

I'm not sure what you mean by boiling the ocean. I'm saying that YANG is built 
and intended for querying capabilities and configuring routers. Why isn't that 
where you are looking first for configuring your monitoring application?

You don't see the major difference between writing a YANG model vs modifying 
all of the standard IETF routing protocols?

Thanks,
Chris.

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to