Hi Peter, Ketan, Acee, 

We've added a permanent entry for B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and 
Flags registry and moved the Flooding Request bit registration to 0x00000020:

0x00000010      B-bit   [draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01]
0x00000020      Flooding Request bit    [draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Wed Jul 08 08:53:07 2020, ppse...@cisco.com wrote:
> Amanda,
> 
> On 07/07/2020 22:54, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > Peter, should we go ahead?
> 
> yes, please.
> 
> thanks,
> Peter
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> > 
> > On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> >> Gunter is on vacation...
> >> Thanks,
> >> Acee
> >>
> >> On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ketan, Peter,
> >>
> >> I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining expert,
> >> but we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Amanda
> >>
> >> On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, ket...@cisco.com wrote:
> >>> Hi Amanda/All,
> >>>
> >>> I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x00000010 for
> >>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for draft-ietf-
> >>> lsr-
> >>> dynamic-flooding?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ketan
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>   From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
> >>> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> >>> To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>
> >>> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; mraj...@juniper.net;
> >>> lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>;
> >>> gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com;
> >>> alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org
> >>> Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-
> >>> ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
> >>>
> >>> Hi Peter, all,
> >>>
> >>>>> For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may
> >>>>> have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation
> >>>>> procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree,
> >>>>> permanent
> >>>>> registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any
> >>>>> time.
> >>>>> Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation
> >>>>> from that registration?
> >>>>
> >>>> please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.
> >>>
> >>> The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the draft-ietf-lsr-
> >>> dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and
> >>> Flags, currently still assigned 0x00000010:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> Amanda
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to