Hi Aijun, You still didn't answer the question as to why you didn't rework this draft for passive interface to be an interface attribute rather than a prefix attribute? Thanks, Acee
On 10/1/20, 6:13 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Aijun, You didn't answer my question and pruned my message. Other than your attempt to expose the topology of areas outside the area, there is no other reason to associate the passive interface attribute with a prefix. We seem to be in a circular discussion.... Acee On 9/30/20, 10:43 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Aijun Wang" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, Acee: Except the corner cases of unnumbered interface, would you like to illustrate other scenarios that the process does not apply? As mentioned in last mail, knowing the passive interfaces can assist the nodes or controller know the boundaries of the network. Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Sep 30, 2020, at 19:47, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
