Hi Yali,
> If this was precise, then the existing multi-instance mechanism would be > sufficient. > [Yali]: MFI is a different solution we recommend to solve this same and > valuable issue. > Well the way I understand this proposal MFI is much weaker solution in terms of required separation. In contrast RFC8202 allows to separate ISIS instances at the process level, but here MFIs as defined must be handled by the same ISIS process This document defines an extension to IS-IS to allow *one standard instance* of the protocol to support multiple update process operations. Thx, R.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
