Hi, Robert: Separate into different protocol instances can accomplish the similar task, but it has some deployment overhead. MFIs within one instance can avoid such cumbersome work, and doesn’t affect the basic routing calculation process.
Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Feb 26, 2021, at 19:00, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Yali, > >> If this was precise, then the existing multi-instance mechanism would be >> sufficient. >> [Yali]: MFI is a different solution we recommend to solve this same and >> valuable issue. > > Well the way I understand this proposal MFI is much weaker solution in terms > of required separation. > > In contrast RFC8202 allows to separate ISIS instances at the process level, > but here MFIs as defined must be handled by the same ISIS process > > This document defines an extension to > IS-IS to allow one standard instance of > the protocol to support multiple update > process operations. > > Thx, > R. > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
