> On Sep 15, 2021, at 11:17 AM, Peter Psenak <ppse...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> So, if someone wants to define new constraints (e.g., Linda's >> server/application metrics), they would need to define the semantics and >> encodings similar to what is being done for bandwidth metrics in >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con/> . Then >> the flex algos could be defined using these metrics. Correct? > > yes, they would need to define a new FAD constraint and/or metric only.
I agree that if the goal is a new metric, then that’s sufficient. [Plug for generic metrics.] It sounded a bit like Linda was wanting a fundamental change to the SPF algorithm. If, so, I believe that would require a new Calc-Type. Linda, could you please clarify? Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
