Speaking as WG chair: Agree totally with Chris here.
Thanks, Acee On 10/14/21, 5:26 AM, "Christian Hopps" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 14, 2021, at 1:25 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The rest of your argument seems to be that we should move forward w the PUA solution just because the draft has been around for a long time. Sorry, that isn’t a valid argument. I sort of got this feeling as well. > Either the WG thinks PUA is good solution or it doesn't - that is the only basis on which a decision to adopt/not adopt should be made. The fact that you keep refreshing/updating the draft carries no weight. Speaking as a WG chair here -- this is spot on. Drafts may exist and be commented on by a WG for years, with the authors making edits they feel address some or all of those comments. The fact that the draft keeps being revised and resubmitted does not imply that it is somehow ready for adoption or that the WG is required to do so. It is not a guarantee that it will achieve standardization. It may be that through revision it gets there, and it may be that it doesn't. Consider that there are plenty of drafts that are submitted and adopted based on their first submission. Sometimes in very little time indeed -- this happens when there's an obvious problem that needs solving, the proposed solution is very good and everyone in the WG clearly agrees on it. Thanks, Chris. > Les _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
