On November 16, 2021 at 4:10:16 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: Hi!
> The IETF is already applying these standards to new documents. The better reference to what the IETF is doing is this one: https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/on-inclusive-language/ > At some point, I'd expect that someone with the time and energy will produce > a single document that updates all the existing documents using the updated > terminology. At least that would be my preference since doing BIS versions > of all these documents is not desirable unless this is being done for other > purposes. For example, it would not make sense to do an RFC 2328 BIS unless > we were going to also correct all the Errata and go through a full review > cycle. I agree on your point about rfc2328bis. OTOH, I don't think that a mass update would work as expected simply because the terminology may not be used within the same context in all cases, so a common replacement may not always make sense. For the case that Mike points at, I think we could "simply" publish a document that Updates rfc2328 and explains what the new terminology should be -- assuming the WG is ok with it. I would think that something like primary/secondary or leader/follower could work. My 2c. Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
