As co-author, I support adopting this draft as a WG document. I favor the experimental track for this. We do not yet agree as to what the content will be. I reserve the right to change my opinion should circumstances change.
T > On Nov 22, 2021, at 6:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > We indicated the intent to adopt of > draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00 as an LSR WG document at the > IETF 112 LSR WG meeting. > We are now confirming WG consensus on this action. Please indicate your > support or objection on this list by 12:00 AM UTC on December 7th, 2021. > > Another question that came to light is whether the document should be > standards track or experimental. If you have an opinion on this matter, > please chime in along with your arguments for one track or the other. We > probably won’t make a final decision on this now but let’s get the discussion > started. > > Here is a link for your convenience: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/ > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/> > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
