Hi All, Support adoption of this document with a preference for the Experimental track at this juncture.
Thanks, Ketan On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 7:42 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee= [email protected]> wrote: > We indicated the intent to adopt of > draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00 as an LSR WG document at > the IETF 112 LSR WG meeting. > > We are now confirming WG consensus on this action. Please indicate your > support or objection on this list by 12:00 AM UTC on December 7th, 2021. > > > > Another question that came to light is whether the document should be > standards track or experimental. If you have an opinion on this matter, > please chime in along with your arguments for one track or the other. We > probably won’t make a final decision on this now but let’s get the > discussion started. > > > > Here is a link for your convenience: > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/ > > > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
