I think the point is that just saying: >> And if customers could do what he suggested then they would not have an >> issue. >> >> But there are deployments where what he suggested is not possible – largely >> I think because the set of “prefixes of interest” is in itself large.
maybe isn't saying nearly enough. "Large" of course is too imprecise. But, more importantly, how do we know that this "large" amount hasn't arisen from bad network design choices. Thanks, Chris. [as wg member] > Well, the alleged customers have not come forward to explain the situation. I > would welcome more specifics, even under NDA. It’s hard to relate to > allegations of scale without specifics. If the area has that many PEs in it, > then is really too large to be a single area in the first place? _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
