Les, > [LES:] I believe some of the alternate proposals are tractable – which is not > to say that I prefer them. > But I don’t want to ask questions like “How do you do this…?” in the absence > of a writeup. I am assuming that if we had a writeup the authors would have > done their best to define a complete solution and then we could meaningfully > review and comment. But without a writeup it is hard for me to say – “Oh yes > – this is much better. Let’s abandon the IGP approach and go this way.”
Well, you’re free to do that of course. And I’m free to object to your draft. Here we sit, stuck. > [LES:] We have responded positively to comments about our solution – > particularly in the area of scale. (Next version of pulse draft will be out > soon – we preferred to enjoy the holidays. 😊) No one will begrudge you some recreation. :) The proposals approach to handling scale issues is to sweep things under the rug, which is very unsatisfying. Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
