Hi, Robert: I remembered we have discussed this. RFC9086 requires every border router run BGP-LS. But normally, we need only one router within IGP run BGP-LS.
I think Tony has gotten one of key use use case for this draft. The difference between us is how to accomplish it. Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Jan 13, 2022, at 18:40, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Tony, > > If you originate BGP-LS on the PE of interest it seems you can stuff it with > whatever you like. I read RFC9086 as one example of it. > > Thx, > R. > >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:05 AM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Robert, >> >>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 5:06 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Well if that would be controller based TE computation it seems that these >>> days BGP-LS (ugh!) would be used instead of IGP flooding to pass that info >>> around. >>> >>> Hence that makes (at least :) two of us pretty puzzled on the real use case >>> here. >> >> >> BGP-LS can’t pick it up unless it’s in the LSDB. Thus, you inject it into >> the LSDB and let BGP-LS convey it to the controller for you. >> >> Tony >>
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
