Hi Tony, Very honestly I must have missed that the objective here is to include those links in the TE constrained computation. You mean MPLS RSVP-TE ?
Is that so in 2022 ? Kind regards, R. On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:58 AM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 2022, at 3:54 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > What puzzles me in this proposal is why are you insisting on making a stub > link not-so-stubby instead of treating it as a passive interface (as others > already suggested) ? > > > > Robert, > > A pure passive interface results in the node advertising the prefixes > associated with the interface, but no link attributes. > > This would give an implementation the option of advertiseing link > attributes for TE to pick up. Note that this would be a new feature even > without any subTLVs. One could advertise the administrative group (i.e. > color) of an inter-AS link, for example. > > T > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
