Hi, Robert: I would say some people are likely to hear other’s explanations, some are reluctant. Anyway, I am eager to hear the independent technical analysis.
For the current scenarios and solutions, we have analyzed that RFC 5316 and RFC5392 are not suitable for such purposes—we must generate bogus AS, bogus Remote ASBR Router ID on every inter-AS, or non inter-AS boundary links. I would like to hear the constructive comments, or other solutions that better the the one in this draft. Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Jan 15, 2022, at 07:15, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Aijun, > >> If not, I would say both you and Les’s understanding of this draft is not >> correct. > > If two (or more) subject matter experts like Les & John can not understand > the IGP draft I would not draw an immediate conclusion that this is their > perception fault. > > Instead I would take a step back and see that perhaps there is something > wrong with the draft itself ? > > Thx, > Robert. >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
