> For the current scenarios and solutions, we have analyzed that RFC 5316 > and RFC5392 are not suitable for such purposes—we must generate bogus AS, > bogus Remote ASBR Router ID on every inter-AS, or non inter-AS boundary > links. >
Why do you think those values need to be "bogus" ? And Inter-AS is just a perfect example on what you call a "stub link" so I would not hold on that much to the nomenclature. I would like to hear the constructive comments, or other solutions that > better the the one in this draft. > I think what has been suggested is just that, but of course you are entitled to have your own opinion. Kind regards, Robert
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
