Sounds good. Thx, R.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:23 PM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > While perhaps pretty obvious, it would be good to also highlight what > implementation should do in the event of covering prefix changes in the > LSDB if those are to happen after registrations have already gone out. > Maybe as simple as de-register and re-register for the new covering prefix > ? > > > > Ok, how about: > > If the ABR has registered for a prefix and that prefix is no > longer advertised by another ABR then an ABR MAY unregister, > re-evaluate its registration and register for a different > prefix. In this way, if a summary prefix changes, the ABR > can shift to the new summary prefix. > > Tony > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
