Peter, >> > The pulse solution does not suffer from the scale issues. >> It shifts that "suffering" to flood the entire domain with information which >> is not needed on P routers and selectively useful on the remote PEs. > > yes, but how much data? Minimal. It's not an issue, no matter how many times > you keep repeating it.
You say minimal, but then you have to have a mechanism in place to limit the amount that you flood. And as I mentioned previously, you know that some customer will turn that up to 11 so that they get more pulses and they will end up imploding. Meanwhile 100k registrations is not a scale issue. As a former BGP engineer, we call that ‘Monday’. If you still don’t like it, we can go down the path that Robert suggested and register for 0/0. We could even go half way down that path and aggregate PE’s into their own prefix and register for just that prefix. > I feel this discussion has reached a point where we keep repeating what has > been said already several times. No point continuing, unless some new data > are on the table. Correct. Shall we agree to disagree? Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
