Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> writes:
Peter, If a given PE needs to get all notifications from all other PEs it is sufficient that it sends to local ABRs a single registration in a form of 0.0.0.0/0 and be done. But realistically speaking the case where services offered by a PE also exist on all 100K other PEs would be pretty rare.
Right, these PEs actually have to be doing something which also has to scale. Thanks, Chris.
Thx, R. On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:42 PM Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote: On 25/01/2022 15:18, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Peter, > > You clearly missed the added new sentence to section 4.3 in version -01 > > It is RECOMMENDED that the ABR register for the > most specific prefix that is less specific than the original prefix. I don't think so. I'm talking about PE to ABR registrations only. I have not even counted the inter-ABR ones. Peter _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
