Yes, we will. We’re still discussing about who will present. I can if there are no other volunteers. You’re welcome to put my name down for now.
T > On Jun 29, 2022, at 11:26 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Speaking as WG chair: > > Can someone present this at IETF 114? It seems like there more interest than > most of the other agenda requests. > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Tony Li <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 12:58 PM > To: Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]>, lsr <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Handling multiple Extended IS Reachability TLVs for a link > > > Hi Ketan, > > > >> On Jun 29, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Tony, >> >> No. It does not work. Take the following text from Sec 4. >> >> If this is insufficient sub-TLV space, then the node MAY advertise >> additional instances of the Extended IS Reachability TLV. The key >> information MUST be replicated identically and the additional sub-TLV >> space may be populated with additional information. The complete >> information for a given key in such cases is the joined set of all >> the carried information under the key in all the TLV instances. >> >> There is a normative MUST there, but the "key information" is unspecified. >> Without that information these rules would not be really useful for >> implementation, would they? > > > They would if the implementors understood the intent and spirit. Perhaps > that’s asking too much. > > > >> >> I agree with the challenge of trying to catalog "keys" and "rules" on a per >> TLV/sub-TLV basis. Perhaps starting with the more widely used TLVs/sub-TLVs >> that are likely to exceed limits would be better than not covering any of >> them? > > > Duly noted. We have had this comment before, we will definitely consider it. > > Tony >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
