[Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Mon, 04 Jul 2022 18:08:58 -0700


Hi all,

This is an update to reflect some of the discussions to date. A diff is attached.  Most of this is a change to terminology to stop using the word ‘instance’ and shift to using ‘multi-part TLV’.

We have been having a discussion about adding more discussion of keys in this document.  We have not done that yet.  This is not an indication of refusal, just making one baby step forward.  More to come… Text contributions are more than welcome.

Other comments?

Regards,
Tony



<<< text/html; x-unix-mode=0644; name="Diff_ draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-00.txt - draft-pkaneria-multi-tlv-01.txt.html": Unrecognized >>>



Begin forwarded message:

Subject: New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
Date: July 4, 2022 at 6:04:37 PM PDT
To: "Antoni Przygienda" <[email protected]>, "Chris Bowers" <[email protected]>, "Les Ginsberg" <[email protected]>, "Parag Kaneriya" <[email protected]>, "Shraddha Hegde" <[email protected]>, "Tony Li" <[email protected]>, "Tony Przygienda" <[email protected]>


A new version of I-D, draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv
Revision: 01
Title: Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS
Document date: 2022-07-04
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 7
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv/
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01

Abstract:
  New technologies are adding new information into IS-IS while
  deployment scales are simultaneously increasing, causing the contents
  of many critical TLVs to exceed the currently supported limit of 255
  octets.  Extensions such as [RFC7356] require significant IS-IS
  changes that could help address the problem, but a less drastic
  solution would be beneficial.  This document codifies the common
  mechanism of extending the TLV content space through multiple TLVs.




The IETF Secretariat



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to