Hi Tony, Thanks the update. 1 clarification question on §5 (new capability)
« If all routers in an area advertise the Multi-part TLV Capability a node MAY advertise multi-part TLVs " Does this mean that if one router does not advertise the capability, routers MUST NOT advertise multi-part TLVs? (and if necessary readvertises LSPs which contained such multi-part TLV) If so, I would favor adding this explicitly. Regards, --Bruno Orange Restricted From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 3:09 AM To: lsr <[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt Hi all, This is an update to reflect some of the discussions to date. A diff is attached. Most of this is a change to terminology to stop using the word 'instance' and shift to using 'multi-part TLV'. We have been having a discussion about adding more discussion of keys in this document. We have not done that yet. This is not an indication of refusal, just making one baby step forward. More to come... Text contributions are more than welcome. Other comments? Regards, Tony Begin forwarded message: From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt Date: July 4, 2022 at 6:04:37 PM PDT To: "Antoni Przygienda" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Chris Bowers" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Les Ginsberg" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Parag Kaneriya" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Shraddha Hegde" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Tony Li" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Tony Przygienda" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> A new version of I-D, draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv Revision: 01 Title: Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS Document date: 2022-07-04 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 7 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01 Abstract: New technologies are adding new information into IS-IS while deployment scales are simultaneously increasing, causing the contents of many critical TLVs to exceed the currently supported limit of 255 octets. Extensions such as [RFC7356] require significant IS-IS changes that could help address the problem, but a less drastic solution would be beneficial. This document codifies the common mechanism of extending the TLV content space through multiple TLVs. The IETF Secretariat _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
