Hi Lars, Thanks for your confirmation.
Acee/John, I haven't received any response (objection or support) from the WG on this change. I believe this may be a good interim step until the WG considers any IANA registry reorganization. Can you please share your views as shepherd and AD respectively? Thanks, Ketan On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 6:31 PM Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-9-30, at 16:37, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> wrote: > > In brief, the proposal was to introduce the following text in the IANA > considerations: > > > > <NEW> > > This document updates the guidance to IANA for further allocations > > from the "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Sub-TLVs" [1] and the > > "OSPFv3 Extended LSA Sub-TLVs" [2] registries and requests the > addition > > of this document as a reference to those registries. It requires > > that any document requesting allocation of code point from these > > two registries need to indicate the applicability of the introduced > > sub-TLV to the L2 Bundle Member TLV in that document. > > something along those lines would work for me. > > Thanks, > Lars > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
