Hi Ketan, et al, From: Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4:34 AM To: Lars Eggert <[email protected]> Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Christian Hopps <[email protected]>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, John Scudder <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, Christian Hopps <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4:34 AM
Hi Lars, Thanks for your confirmation. Acee/John, I haven't received any response (objection or support) from the WG on this change. I believe this may be a good interim step until the WG considers any IANA registry reorganization. Can you please share your views as shepherd and AD respectively? The text below looks good to me. Thanks, Acee Thanks, Ketan On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 6:31 PM Lars Eggert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, On 2022-9-30, at 16:37, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > In brief, the proposal was to introduce the following text in the IANA > considerations: > > <NEW> > This document updates the guidance to IANA for further allocations > from the "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Sub-TLVs" [1] and the > "OSPFv3 Extended LSA Sub-TLVs" [2] registries and requests the addition > of this document as a reference to those registries. It requires > that any document requesting allocation of code point from these > two registries need to indicate the applicability of the introduced > sub-TLV to the L2 Bundle Member TLV in that document. something along those lines would work for me. Thanks, Lars
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
