I cleared based on -07. Thanks for the quick turnaround! Lars
> On 2022-10-5, at 8:17, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > We've just posted an update that includes the text as discussed: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-07 > > I hope that this addresses your DISCUSS. > > Thanks, > Ketan > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:44 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ketan, et al, > > > > From: Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4:34 AM > To: Lars Eggert <[email protected]> > Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Christian Hopps > <[email protected]>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, John Scudder > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06: (with > DISCUSS and COMMENT) > Resent-From: <[email protected]> > Resent-To: Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]>, Acee Lindem > <[email protected]>, Christian Hopps <[email protected]> > Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4:34 AM > > > > Hi Lars, > > > > Thanks for your confirmation. > > > > Acee/John, I haven't received any response (objection or support) from the WG > on this change. I believe this may be a good interim step until the WG > considers any IANA registry reorganization. Can you please share your views > as shepherd and AD respectively? > > > > The text below looks good to me. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > Thanks, > > Ketan > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 6:31 PM Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2022-9-30, at 16:37, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> wrote: > > In brief, the proposal was to introduce the following text in the IANA > > considerations: > > > > <NEW> > > This document updates the guidance to IANA for further allocations > > from the "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Sub-TLVs" [1] and the > > "OSPFv3 Extended LSA Sub-TLVs" [2] registries and requests the addition > > of this document as a reference to those registries. It requires > > that any document requesting allocation of code point from these > > two registries need to indicate the applicability of the introduced > > sub-TLV to the L2 Bundle Member TLV in that document. > > something along those lines would work for me. > > Thanks, > Lars > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
