Hi Les,

Thanks a lot for your review and comments.

This new MSD is a per-node capability just like ERLD-MSD, mainly because it 
represents how many MPLS labels the node can read, and it is not related with 
the links.

And the description in this draft you mentioned is written taking example by 
RFC9088(section 4. Advertising ERLD Using IS-IS).

I'll explicitly state the scope of the new MSD in the next version. 




Best Regards,

Yao



Original



From: LesGinsberg(ginsberg) <[email protected]>
To: 刘尧00165286;[email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;
Date: 2023年08月28日 20:57
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for 
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt




Yao –


 


Both RFC 8476(OSPF) and RFC 8491(IS-IS) define MSD advertisements with per-link 
scope and per-node scope.


 


Your draft only states: 


 


“If a router has multiple interfaces with different capabilities of


   reading the maximum label stack depth, the router MUST advertise the


   smallest value found across all its interfaces.”


 


This suggests that you intend only to advertise a per-node capability – but as 
you don’t explicitly state that – and you don’t provide a reason why a per link 
capability isn’t applicable, I am unclear as to what your intentions are here.


 


Could you clarify whether you intend to support both per link and per node 
capability – and if not why not?


 


Thanx.


 


   Les


 


 




From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
 Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 12:33 AM
 To: [email protected]; [email protected]
 Subject: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for 
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt




 

Hi All,

A new version of draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd has just been uploaded.

In this document, a new type of MSD is defined to reflect the Readable Label 
Depth(RLD), which helps in the MPLS MNA solution.

In this version, the main update is that some description is added to explain 
why a new MSD is preferred instead of the ERLD-MSD.

Currently this new MSD is called Base MPLS Inspection MSD, it may be changed to 
a more straightforward name like RLD-MSD based on the description in the MNA 
architecture/solution document. 

Your comments and suggestions are more than welcome!

 

Thanks,

Yao


Original



From: [email protected] <[email protected]>



Date: 2023年08月28日 14:55



Subject: New Version Notification for draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt




A new version of Internet-Draft draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt has
 been successfully submitted by Yao Liu and posted to the
 IETF repository.
 
 Name:     draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd
 Revision: 01
 Title:    Signaling Base MPLS Inspection MSD
 Date:     2023-08-27
 Group:    Individual Submission
 Pages:    7
 URL:      
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
 Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd/
 HTML:     
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.html
 HTMLized: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd
 Diff:     
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01
 
 Abstract:
 
    This document defines a new type of MSD, Base MPLS Inspection MSD to
    reflect the Readable Label Depth(RLD), and the mechanism to signal
    this MSD using IGP and BGP-LS.
 
 
 
 The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to