Hi Yao,

Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of different line 
cards, where the line cards are based on different forwarding engines.

RLD needs to be link specific.

Regards,
Tony


> On Aug 28, 2023, at 6:55 PM, <liu.ya...@zte.com.cn> <liu.ya...@zte.com.cn> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Les,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
> 
> This new MSD is a per-node capability just like ERLD-MSD, mainly because it 
> represents how many MPLS labels the node can read, and it is not related with 
> the links.
> 
> And the description in this draft you mentioned is written taking example by 
> RFC9088(section 4. Advertising ERLD Using IS-IS).
> 
> I'll explicitly state the scope of the new MSD in the next version. 
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Yao
> 
> Original
> From: LesGinsberg(ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>
> To: 刘尧00165286;m...@ietf.org <m...@ietf.org>;lsr@ietf.org <lsr@ietf.org>;
> Date: 2023年08月28日 20:57
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for 
> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
> Yao –
> 
>  
> 
> Both RFC 8476(OSPF) and RFC 8491(IS-IS) define MSD advertisements with 
> per-link scope and per-node scope.
> 
>  
> 
> Your draft only states: 
> 
>  
> 
> “If a router has multiple interfaces with different capabilities of
> 
>    reading the maximum label stack depth, the router MUST advertise the
> 
>    smallest value found across all its interfaces.”
> 
>  
> 
> This suggests that you intend only to advertise a per-node capability – but 
> as you don’t explicitly state that – and you don’t provide a reason why a per 
> link capability isn’t applicable, I am unclear as to what your intentions are 
> here.
> 
>  
> 
> Could you clarify whether you intend to support both per link and per node 
> capability – and if not why not?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanx.
> 
>  
> 
>    Les
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 12:33 AM
> To: m...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for 
> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
> 
>  
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> A new version of draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd has just been uploaded.
> 
> In this document, a new type of MSD is defined to reflect the Readable Label 
> Depth(RLD), which helps in the MPLS MNA solution.
> 
> In this version, the main update is that some description is added to explain 
> why a new MSD is preferred instead of the ERLD-MSD.
> 
> Currently this new MSD is called Base MPLS Inspection MSD, it may be changed 
> to a more straightforward name like RLD-MSD based on the description in the 
> MNA architecture/solution document. 
> 
> Your comments and suggestions are more than welcome!
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yao
> 
> Original
> 
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org> 
> <internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>>
> 
> Date: 2023年08月28日 14:55
> 
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
> 
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt has
> been successfully submitted by Yao Liu and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:     draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd
> Revision: 01
> Title:    Signaling Base MPLS Inspection MSD
> Date:     2023-08-27
> Group:    Individual Submission
> Pages:    7
> URL:      
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd/
> HTML:     
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.html
> HTMLized: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd
> Diff:     
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>    This document defines a new type of MSD, Base MPLS Inspection MSD to
>    reflect the Readable Label Depth(RLD), and the mechanism to signal
>    this MSD using IGP and BGP-LS.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to