Hi Yao, IMHO, that was a mistake in the specification of ERLD.
I’m hopeful that we don’t repeat the same mistake. Tony > On Aug 29, 2023, at 1:22 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > > > Thanks a lot for your suggestion. This scenario would be taken into > consideration. > > But on the other hand, what I haven't understood is that why ERLD-MSD is > limited to per-node scope considering that each line card may have different > capabilities to read through the label stack. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yao > > Original > From: TonyLi <[email protected]> > To: 刘尧00165286; > Cc: Les Ginsberg <[email protected]>;mpls <[email protected]>;[email protected] > <[email protected]>; > Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36 > Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for > draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt > > Hi Yao, > Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of different line > cards, where the line cards are based on different forwarding engines. > > RLD needs to be link specific. > > Regards, > Tony > > >> On Aug 28, 2023, at 6:55 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Les, >> >> Thanks a lot for your review and comments. >> >> This new MSD is a per-node capability just like ERLD-MSD, mainly because it >> represents how many MPLS labels the node can read, and it is not related >> with the links. >> >> And the description in this draft you mentioned is written taking example by >> RFC9088(section 4. Advertising ERLD Using IS-IS). >> >> I'll explicitly state the scope of the new MSD in the next version. >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Yao >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > From: LesGinsberg(ginsberg) <[email protected]> > To: 刘尧00165286;[email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>; > Date: 2023年08月28日 20:57 > Subject: RE: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for > draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt > Yao – > > > > Both RFC 8476(OSPF) and RFC 8491(IS-IS) define MSD advertisements with > per-link scope and per-node scope. > > > > Your draft only states: > > > > “If a router has multiple interfaces with different capabilities of > > reading the maximum label stack depth, the router MUST advertise the > > smallest value found across all its interfaces.” > > > > This suggests that you intend only to advertise a per-node capability – but > as you don’t explicitly state that – and you don’t provide a reason why a per > link capability isn’t applicable, I am unclear as to what your intentions are > here. > > > > Could you clarify whether you intend to support both per link and per node > capability – and if not why not? > > > > Thanx. > > > > Les > > > > > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 12:33 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for > draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt > > > > Hi All, > > A new version of draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd has just been uploaded. > > In this document, a new type of MSD is defined to reflect the Readable Label > Depth(RLD), which helps in the MPLS MNA solution. > > In this version, the main update is that some description is added to explain > why a new MSD is preferred instead of the ERLD-MSD. > > Currently this new MSD is called Base MPLS Inspection MSD, it may be changed > to a more straightforward name like RLD-MSD based on the description in the > MNA architecture/solution document. > > Your comments and suggestions are more than welcome! > > > > Thanks, > > Yao > > Original > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Date: 2023年08月28日 14:55 > > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt > > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt has > been successfully submitted by Yao Liu and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd > Revision: 01 > Title: Signaling Base MPLS Inspection MSD > Date: 2023-08-27 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 7 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd/ > HTML: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.html > HTMLized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd > Diff: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01 > > Abstract: > > This document defines a new type of MSD, Base MPLS Inspection MSD to > reflect the Readable Label Depth(RLD), and the mechanism to signal > this MSD using IGP and BGP-LS. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
