Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to David Mandelberg for their secdir reviews. Also for the detailed shepherd review by Yingzhen Qu. General: I think the definition and explanation of how the term 'key' as used in this context is good. I also agree w/ Ketan's comment on lines 247-251 for how to clarify the wording about where 'key' is defined for a given TLV. Section 10: The ability to add multiple TLVs to an IS-IS session (possibly not the right word) may increase the ability to cause a denial of service via resource exhaustion. If that is a risk, please address this security concern. Otherwise, please clarify why it isn't a concern. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
