Which text ?

https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-03&url2=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04&difftype=--html

Thx,
R.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:52 PM Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> I guess you are now fine with the draft with this text.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> > On Apr 23, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > ok, I'm fine adding some text for your case.
> >
> > Thx Peter !
> >
> > It is not "my use case" but ability to trigger UPA for make-before-break
> which I think always is rather a good thing.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > R.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:40 PM Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > On 23/04/2025 16:35, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>> If the egress PE is the only BGP NH, then reacting to max-metric or
> OL-bit set would make some BGP destinations unreachable.
> >>
> >> Well this entirely depends on how one reacts on UPA if UPA is
> signalling the only one left BGP path/NH as down irrespective of the
> trigger. Does it stop the service to the destination or not ...
> >>
> >> If there are alternate paths the best path can install new next hop.
> >>
> >> If there are no alternate paths I would rather keep one installed
> active - for example to address the case where one ABR can still reach
> egress PE and the other one generated UPA.
> >>
> >>> So why not trigger UPA in such cases to hint him to switch to
> alternate next hops if available ?
> >> I'm not saying it can not be done. The implementation can chose to
> advertise the UPA for the summary component prefix if the such prefix
> metric in the source area/domain crosses certain value or if the prefix
> originator is overloaded.
> >> But this would make it not compliant with current text in section 4
> which was the main point of my question. So why not leave the door a bit
> open for it in the spec ?
> > ok, I'm fine adding some text for your case.
> > thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> >>
> >> Thx,
> >> R.
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to