Keywords: DataAccWG

Attendees:
   Tim Axelrod
   Deborah Levine
   Kem Cook
   Ani Thakar
   Maria Nieto-Santisteban
   Sergei Nikolaev
   Jacek Becla



object becoming two objects
===========================
Suggested by Robert at the meeting in Tucson:
 - keep number of children and parent id for each object

 - perhaps we want to keep pointers to children?

 - parent/child relation doesn't well reflect LSST use cases
   - although there are cases where it helps, e.g.
     it helps with proper motion
 - in LSST we will have the following cases:
   - "confusion that comes and goes". We will switch
     back and forth between 1 object and multiple objects
   - 1 object will split and stay split
   - multiple objects will join and stay joint
   - solar moving object will merge with non-moving object,
     than would go away

- as our knowledge improves, these use cases will be less
  frequent that at the beginning of the survey

- perhaps we should call it confused/resolved instead of
  children/parent?

- what is the ration between confused-resolved objects
  vs never-confused objects?
   - in crowded place, most things might be confusable

- confusion will be different for different bands (by design)
   - we will use certain filters in good weather,
     and different filters in bad weather
      - that introduces nasty systematic errors

--> will discuss it further this Friday
--> Deborah will try to summarize what info related to
    confused/resolved objects will be readily needed
    from database from a scientist point of view



Data used for testing Object-table partitioning?
================================================
 - use data from USNO
 - naturally that data will be incompatible with our
   prototype schema, so transfer ra, dec, and other
   attributes well aligned with our schema, and fill
   remaining gaps with randomly generated numbers
 - ~ 1 billion objects, 0.5 TB of data, covers entire sky
 - Jacek will work with Kem on getting the data



FOV in DC2?
===========
 - there will be more than one source of images in DC2
   - some data sources will have full LSST FOV images
   - some (e.g. sfht legacy) will have smaller images



how to split data from different surveys/skymapper for DC2?
===========================================================
 - probably right at the top, so effectively at db level
   - no objections, it'd be crazy to mix data from different
     surveys
 --> so this becomes a baseline from now on

 --> we will not be doing any cross correlation between
     data from different data sources in DC2



TIMESTAMP as a way to version data?
===================================
- Using TIMESTAMP would mean that the same object would always
  have different version at base camp and at archive center
- if it takes more than 1 second to update many objects,
  these objects would have different TIMESTAMP (although logically
  they should have the same version)
- a more discrete number, like pipeline version or something
  like this is more natural, not time when transaction was
  executed in db
- this issue is closely related to data provenance
--> defer this topic, provenance will be dealt with in DC3



Is most recent history of objects (and no DIASources)
sufficient to generate alert?
=====================================================
 - our current scheme:
   - immediately after Deep Det we transfer entire object catalog
     from Archive Center to Base, and generate alerts
     based on Object table only
   - later, we generate alerts based on info from object catalog
     and recent DIASources
 - in this scheme fidelity of generating alert is different
   depending at what point in time alert is generated

- the system has to be flexible (e.g. perhaps what works
  at the beginning of the survey will not work later)

 - it would be useful for some people who will be doing science
   with transients and who deeply care about alerts to tell us
   what they are thinking

- maybe raise that at all-hands next Friday

- in general, we need to have a way to get our questions out
  to the collaboration and get feedback
   - will be discussed next Friday at all-hands (Tim's session)



Big meeting this Friday: 9:00 - 11:00 PST (2 hours, not 3 hours)

thanks,
Jacek



Jacek Becla wrote:
Keywords: DataAccWG

Hi,

We will have a database telecon tomorrow (Wednesday) at 11:00 am PST. Agenda:
 - partitioning Object table (in particular how to test)
 - other topics depending on who is present...


Phone number: 866 330 1200
Pass code:    300 2363

Reminder: we are going to have a big 3-hour video conf this Friday,
so let's treat this one lightly.

Jacek

_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

Reply via email to