Right, I was confusing what you meant by Thing.  It certainly isn't a
detection.

Your celestial, physical thing is a celestial instantiation--would it hurt
the programmer types too much to call it an instantiation?

cheers,

Kem

> Actually, to me, "detection" sounds like a single data point in one band
> on one night....  If I were starting from
> scratch, I'd try to find a nomenclature that has separate and not easily
> confused  words for each of these things:
>
> A single extractable flux from one filter at one observational epoch; a
> single data point; a detection
> All the extractable fluxes in all filters for one position for one
> observational epoch; a visit
> All the extractable fluxes in all filters which are believed to belong
> to the same physical celestial entity; an "object"?
> The actual physical celestial entity; a star, galaxy, solar system
> object, etc. which is what I called Thing.  Starting from scratch I
> might call this an "object" or a "source"
>
> Kem Cook wrote:
>> I think we should use detection for Deborah's Thing.
>>
>> Kem
>>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>> --> Deborah will try to summarize what info related to
>>>>     confused/resolved objects will be readily needed
>>>>     from database from a scientist point of view
>>>>
>>> Deborah has so attempted, the result is attached!
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Deborah Levine, Ph.D.                          (626)395-8567 (Office)
>>> Operations Scientist                           (626)590-7500 (Mobile)
>>> Spitzer Space Telescope Science Center         (626)432-7484 (FAX)
>>> Mail Code 314-6, Caltech                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Pasadena, CA 91125
>>>
>>> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>>> Albert Einstein
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LSST-data mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LSST-data mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
>>
>>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Deborah Levine, Ph.D.                          (626)395-8567 (Office)
> Operations Scientist                           (626)590-7500 (Mobile)
> Spitzer Space Telescope Science Center         (626)432-7484 (FAX)
> Mail Code 314-6, Caltech                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pasadena, CA 91125
>
> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
> Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LSST-data mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
>
_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

Reply via email to