Hey Tim, On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Tim Axelrod wrote:
I think the current setup, which does not group the packages under apps or mw, works well for now.
Okay; if you're happy, I'm happy ;-)
The one immediate thing I'd like to see is some more descriptive names for the middleware packages - das and dps just don't trigger much in my brain...
this is an artifact of time when our names were driven by what we wanted to see in python packages--short, sweet names. I'm happy to expand these to be more descriptive. Do you have any objection to sub-dividing middleware packages below these directories, rather than having them up with the other packages?
cheers, Ray _______________________________________________ LSST-data mailing list [email protected] http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
