Hi Ray,

Let's try the DC2 SVN directory as it now stands. If we find the structure
doesn't work well, we can change it.  As you know, it's very easy to 
reconfigure and/or rename SVN objects.

Cheers, Robyn



On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:29:39PM -0600, Ray Plante wrote:
> 
> This is still fine, but I think the idea would be that packages would be 
> grouped according to their role in the DM system as defined in the UML 
> model.  For instance, all pipeline module packages would go under apps. 
> Some further grouping might be in order; for example, under mw/das, we 
> could have separate packages for database ingest service, replication, 
> etc.

_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

Reply via email to