On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 15:35 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Yes, but it doesn't always fail. However, I have had it fail and I got > others to confirm it. > > See the thread at starting at: > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-March/059128.html > > As I dug through the kernel source to see what was happening, there is > no tie between memory being in core and a specific process instance that > I could see. The 'unexpected pass' seemed to be specific to IA32 builds. >
Well, I tried an ia32 system and various fedora kernels (all the way back to fc5 which is based on 2.6.15) and on each I ran the test in a loop for over an hour. I have not been able to get it to fail yet. Do you by chance have the kernel config file from a kernel where you were able to reproduce this? I am perplexed and really would like to see how this is failing. thanks, - Doug ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
