Oops, I just realized that my patch was against an older version of ltp
and this test has changed. The other changes are unrelated but it does
break the diff. Here is a patch against ltp-full-20070331.
sorry for any confusion,
- Doug
Recent kernels have ext2 and ext3 support in separate modules. On a typical
installation this means that ext2 support often is not loaded which will
cause the sysfs01 test to fail when it asks for the filesystem index of
ext2. This patch changes the test to ask for "proc" instead of "ext2"
since that should always be compiled in.
Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----------------------------------------------------
--- ltp-full-20070331/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c.ext2
2007-04-27 09:58:29.000000000 -0400
+++ ltp-full-20070331/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c 2007-04-27
09:58:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
*
*RESTRICTIONS:
*There is no glibc or libc support
- *Kernel should be compiled with ext2 filesystem support
+ *Kernel should be compiled with proc filesystem support
******************************************************************************/
#include "test.h"
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
Tst_count = 0;
/* option 1, buf holds fs name */
- TEST(syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "ext2"));
+ TEST(syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"));
/* check return code */
if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
