On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:49 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > The test result: > > [..snip..] > inotify02 8 PASS : get event: wd=1 mask=800 cookie=0 len=0 name="" > inotify02 9 FAIL : don't get event: mask=0 > > The test purposes of these 2 testcases: > > rename yourself IN_MOVE_SELF > rename back IN_MOVE_SELF > > Referring to the man inotify(7): > > If successive output inotify events produced on the inotify file > descriptor are identical (same wd, mask, cookie, and name) then they > are coalesced into a single event. > > So when the time interval between the above 2 events is short enough, We'll > get only one event, that's why the test failed. > > So should we remove 9th testcase, or arrange those cases in a different order, > or sleep() some time between the 2 events, or ...?
I would prefer sleeping between the events rather than removing 9th testcase ;-) What do you all think ?? Regards-- Subrata > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
